Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 681
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4178 vs 2473
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 6.498
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 vs 140.06
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 0.502
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 vs 9.613
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.288 vs 12.49
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1151
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2073
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1151
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2073
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 343 vs 170

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 216
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1733
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 681
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4178 2473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.275 6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	227.879 140.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.508 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.582 9.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.288 12.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 2073
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	343 170

Compare specifications (specs)