Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 2x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 551
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 144
• Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4178 vs 2530
• 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 2.692
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 vs 161.29
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 vs 0.55
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 vs 11.858
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.288 vs 17.753
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1263
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1263

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 1733
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 551
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 144
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4178 2530
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.275 2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	227.879 161.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.508 0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.582 11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.288 17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3327

Compare specifications (specs)