Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4.1x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 56x more pipelines: 1344 vs 24
• 6.1x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 922
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 216
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 4178
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 24.275
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 227.879
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 1.508
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 vs 15.582
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.208 vs 30.288
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 1404
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 1733
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3340
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 1404
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 1733
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3340
• 5.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	922 5345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 537
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4178 15511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.275 41.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	227.879 971.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.508 4.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.582 40.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.288 86.208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	343 1839

Compare specifications (specs)