Intel HD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 24 vs 8
- 19.4x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
- 128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB
- 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 vs 111
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 43
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 494
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 494
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 7 May 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 24 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 vs 111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 43 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 43 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4182 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 494 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | G98 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 7 May 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1336 | 1667 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $54.50 | |
Price now | $49.75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 11.12 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |