Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4614 vs 4463
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2304
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 4614 vs 4463
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1945 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1945 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • 2x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
  • 2x better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 1107
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 266
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 1859
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 1859
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 48 vs 24
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1461 vs 1107
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 266
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 vs 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 vs 1859

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1107
1461
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
266
569
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4614
4463
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1859
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1945
958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1859
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1945
958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
2304
Name Intel HD Graphics 630 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark 1107 1461
PassMark - G2D Mark 266 569
Geekbench - OpenCL 4614 4463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 32.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1859 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1945 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1859 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1945 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 2304
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 388

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 630 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Generation 8.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Broadwell GT3e
Launch date 30 August 2016 5 September 2014
Place in performance rating 1235 790
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 441.6 gflops 883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 24 48
Texture fill rate 27.6 GTexel / s 55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x1
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync