Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4614 vs 4463
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2304
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4614 vs 4463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 2304 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- 2x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- 2x better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 1107
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 266
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 1859
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 1859
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 vs 1107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 vs 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 vs 1859 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1107 | 1461 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 | 569 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4614 | 4463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 2304 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1235 | 790 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |