Intel Arc A370M vs AMD Radeon E8870
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2733.3x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 36.948
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 vs 874.689
- 9.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 1.11
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 708
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5115 vs 3368
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 vs 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 vs 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 vs 1.11 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 708 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 vs 3368 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A370M | AMD Radeon E8870 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | 1.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 708 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | 3368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29661 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A370M | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Saturn |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 351 | 352 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |