Intel Arc A370M vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A370M

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
5.2x more core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1100 MHz
21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 36.485
6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 vs 246.614
5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 1.888
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.258 vs 21.014
11.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 482.549 vs 42.981
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 338
3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5115 vs 1358
4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29747 vs 6620
4.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3443 vs 720

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 Mar 2022 vs 3 January 2017
Core clock speed	1550 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Pipelines	1024 vs 48
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 14 nm
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171 vs 36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1470.844 vs 246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937 vs 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	71.258 vs 21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	482.549 vs 42.981
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 338
PassMark - G3D Mark	5115 vs 1358
Geekbench - OpenCL	29747 vs 6620
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3443 vs 720

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

167.171

36.485

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1470.844

246.614

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.937

1.888

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

71.258

21.014

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

482.549

42.981

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

338

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5115

1358

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29747

6620

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3443

720

Name	Intel Arc A370M	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	167.171	36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1470.844	246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.937	1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	71.258	21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	482.549	42.981
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	338
PassMark - G3D Mark	5115	1358
Geekbench - OpenCL	29747	6620
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3443	720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3333

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A370M	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Generation 9.5
Code name	DG2-128	Kaby Lake GT3e
Launch date	30 Mar 2022	3 January 2017
Place in performance rating	333	1136
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	1550 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,050 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.198 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	48
Pixel fill rate	65.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	131.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	7200 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync