Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 1203.7x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 105.107
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 vs 1225.96
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 8.76
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.258 vs 35.714
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29668 vs 28476
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 19 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 148 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 vs 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 vs 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 vs 8.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 vs 35.714 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29668 vs 28476 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 63% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1024
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 489.884 vs 482.549
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 724
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9638 vs 5115
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3626 vs 3443
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 vs 482.549 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 724 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9638 vs 5115 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3626 vs 3443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | 8.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | 489.884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 769 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | 9638 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29668 | 28476 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 | 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | GM204 |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 361 | 363 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1664 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 148 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |