Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1216 MHz
• 911.1x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 144 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 165 Watt
• 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 110.006
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 vs 1348.307
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 9.194
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.258 vs 37.443
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 482.549 vs 477.015

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

• 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 724
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11105 vs 5115
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34883 vs 29687
• Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4321 vs 3443

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	167.171 110.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1470.844 1348.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.937 9.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.258 37.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	482.549 477.015
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 791
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5115 11105
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	29687 34883
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3443 4321

Compare specifications (specs)