Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2.6x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 5189.2x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 103.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 374
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 2817
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 13719
- 13.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 40.311
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 795.334
- 11.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 3.328
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 64.205
- 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 181.508
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 8 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 103.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 374 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 vs 2817 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 vs 13719 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 40.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 vs 795.334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 3.328 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 vs 64.205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 181.508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 374 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | 2817 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | 13719 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 40.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | 795.334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 3.328 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 64.205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 181.508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A750 | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | DG2-512 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 8 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 682 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 103.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 240.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |