Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Arc A750

NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 99% higher core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1029 MHz
2.1x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1124 MHz
29899.9x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
9.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 151
11.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 1096
5.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2612 vs 503
17x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 5771
23.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 22.848
39x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 162.594
30.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 1.237
6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 21.15
20.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 95.545

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 Oct 2022 vs 12 March 2014
Core clock speed	2050 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	537.6 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3584 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	720 vs 151
PassMark - G3D Mark	12373 vs 1096
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2612 vs 503
Geekbench - OpenCL	98254 vs 5771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	528.023 vs 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	6333.285 vs 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	37.29 vs 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	140.823 vs 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1972.437 vs 95.545

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

6.8x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 225 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

720

151

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12373

1096

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2612

503

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

98254

5771

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

528.023

22.848

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6333.285

162.594

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37.29

1.237

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

140.823

21.15

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972.437

95.545

Name	Intel Arc A750	NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G2D Mark	720	151
PassMark - G3D Mark	12373	1096
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2612	503
Geekbench - OpenCL	98254	5771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	528.023	22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	6333.285	162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	37.29	1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	140.823	21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1972.437	95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3191

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Arc A750	NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Maxwell
Code name	DG2-512	GM108
Launch date	12 Oct 2022	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	78	1235
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	2050 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	17.20 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3584	384
Pixel fill rate	268.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	537.6 GTexel/s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	21700 million
Floating-point performance		863.2 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	16.02 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	2002 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus