Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 564
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 7881
- 8.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2612 vs 305
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 39165
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 134.765
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 1316.075
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 8.799
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 94.915
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 573.418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 30 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 vs 7881 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 vs 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 vs 39165 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 vs 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 vs 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 573.418 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | 7881 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | 39165 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 573.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
Code name | DG2-512 | TU107 |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 30 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 376 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 21700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |