Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A30M and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A30M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 56.7x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
| Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 26 April 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 8x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53806 vs 30987
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 765 vs 696
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8164 vs 5862
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53806 vs 30987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 765 vs 696 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8164 vs 5862 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A30M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc Pro A30M | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30987 | 53806 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 696 | 765 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5862 | 8164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc Pro A30M | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | DG2-128 | Capsaicin |
| Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 26 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 196 | 198 |
| Design | reference | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Price now | $849 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,024 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.096 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.00 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 3x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 277 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc Pro A30M with others
IntelArc Pro A30M vs
NVIDIAGRID M6-8Q
IntelArc Pro A30M vs
AMDRadeon Pro Duo
IntelArc Pro A30M vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
IntelArc Pro A30M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
IntelArc Pro A30M vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
IntelArc Pro A30M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
