Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A30M and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A30M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 56.7x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
| Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 26 April 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 8x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55512 vs 30987
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 696
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8299 vs 5862
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 vs 30987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 vs 696 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 vs 5862 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A30M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc Pro A30M | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30987 | 55512 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 696 | 787 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5862 | 8299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc Pro A30M | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | DG2-128 | Capsaicin |
| Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 26 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 214 | 192 |
| Design | reference | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Price now | $849 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,024 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.096 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.00 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 3x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 277 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
