Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A30M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A30M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 696 vs 529

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70509 vs 30987
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12513 vs 5862

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A30M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30987 70509
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	696 529
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5862 12513

Compare specifications (specs)