Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1833 vs 1432
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 305
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8493 vs 7182
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 2675
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 2675
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1623 vs 1290
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1623 vs 1290
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3157
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1833 vs 1432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8493 vs 7182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1623 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1623 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 | 1833 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 | 8493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | 2801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | 2801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | 3360 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 550 | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | Tropo |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 952 | 962 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |