Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
  • Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 3883
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2675 vs 2646
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2675 vs 2646
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 1 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 7182 vs 3883
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2675 vs 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2675 vs 2646

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1577 vs 1432
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 305
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 1290
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 1290
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3157
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3157
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1577 vs 1432
PassMark - G2D Mark 410 vs 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3493 vs 1290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3493 vs 1290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 vs 3157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 vs 3157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1432
1577
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
305
410
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7182
3883
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2675
2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2675
2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1290
3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1290
3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
3339
Name Intel Iris Graphics 550 NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark 1432 1577
PassMark - G2D Mark 305 410
Geekbench - OpenCL 7182 3883
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2675 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2675 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1290 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1290 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3157 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3157 3339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.155

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Graphics 550 NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Kepler
Code name Skylake GT3e GK107
Launch date 1 September 2015 1 March 2013
Place in performance rating 953 965
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Price now $464
Value for money (0-100) 4.14

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 51 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops
Texture fill rate 30.53 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 202 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync