Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 21.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1358 vs 994
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 62
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 11 November 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 vs 994 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 62 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- 2x more core clock speed: 602 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 6620
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 vs 6620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 | 994 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 62 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6620 | 15302 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GT200B |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1136 | 1313 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,799 | |
| Price now | $149.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.67 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

