Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 10.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 30 May 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 vs 339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 811 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- Around 73% better floating-point performance: 1,530 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2798 vs 1576
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8632 vs 7095
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 2652
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 2652
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1564
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 811 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 vs 1576 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8632 vs 7095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1576 | 2798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 339 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7095 | 8632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 4133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 4133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK106 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 857 | 860 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
Price now | $177.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 811 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,530 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 960 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |