Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 13.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 204 Watt
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 10 December 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 204 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 48
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2707 vs 1590
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 377
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9891 vs 7012
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3501 vs 2652
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3501 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 1564
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2707 vs 1590 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 451 vs 377 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9891 vs 7012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3501 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3501 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 2707 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 451 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 9891 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3335 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.377 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.66 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF100 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 10 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 851 | 774 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
| Price now | $332.21 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
