Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 33.836
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 15 February 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 33.836 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2174 vs 1721
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 357
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 vs 7356
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 506.712 vs 465.116
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 vs 2.796
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 vs 29.115
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 153.657 vs 54.932
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 vs 2780
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 vs 1884
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 vs 3343
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 vs 2780
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 vs 1884
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 vs 3343
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 711 vs 619
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 vs 1721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 vs 357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 vs 7356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 506.712 vs 465.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 vs 2.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 vs 29.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 vs 54.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 vs 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 vs 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 vs 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 vs 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 vs 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 711 vs 619 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 | 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 | 14263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 153.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 14630 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 711 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 15 February 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1031 | 557 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,280 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 40 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||

