Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Radeon 9100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Radeon 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 289x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1734 vs 6
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 163
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 April 2003 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 vs 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 163 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 163 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | R200 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 April 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1058 | 1056 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 60 million |
Texture fill rate | 2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz |