Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 11.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1731 vs 150
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 23 January 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1731 vs 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 155 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 120 vs 48
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 120 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1731 | 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 155 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7339 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | RV635 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 23 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1061 | 1063 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 378 million |
Floating-point performance | 174 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 5.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz |