Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Radeon X850 PRO
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Radeon X850 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 23.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1731 vs 73
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 December 2004 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1731 vs 73 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 157 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X850 PRO
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 507 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 507 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X850 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon X850 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1731 | 73 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 157 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7339 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon X850 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | R400 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | R480 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 December 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1061 | 1064 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 507 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 160 million |
Texture fill rate | 6.08 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 33.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1040 MHz |