Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 15.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 236 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1734 vs 1285
- 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 59
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3325
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3325
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 16 June 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 236 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 vs 1285 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 59 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 240 vs 48
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21396 vs 7346
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2697 vs 1884
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2697 vs 1884
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 240 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21396 vs 7346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2697 vs 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2697 vs 1884 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 | 1285 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 59 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7346 | 21396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | GT200 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 16 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1059 | 1062 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $522.78 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.98 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1296 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 240 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 236 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 280
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
