Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 13x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 195 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3306
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 32x more pipelines: 1536 vs 48
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 1721
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 357
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18376 vs 7356
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.086 vs 37.109
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 vs 465.116
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 vs 2.796
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.463 vs 29.115
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.577 vs 54.932
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 2780
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 1884
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 2780
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 1884
• 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 vs 619

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1721 5590
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	357 531
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7356 18376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.109 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.116 989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.796 4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.115 36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.932 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3306
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 2004

Compare specifications (specs)