Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 264
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 283
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 951
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 951

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX

• Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1739 264
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 283
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 951
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 951

Compare specifications (specs)