Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 863 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 288
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7344 vs 7107
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 8.832
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 vs 0.731
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 vs 19.952
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 vs 43.535

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1993 vs 1739
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 465.116
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2780
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1884
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2780
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1884
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 vs 619

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1739 1993
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 288
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7344 7107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.109 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.116 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.796 0.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.115 19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.932 43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 759

Compare specifications (specs)