Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 715 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 24.00 GB/s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3158
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3158
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3158 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | AMD Radeon R7 M260X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 986 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake GT2 | Opal |
Launch price (MSRP) | $969 | |
Place in performance rating | 1222 | 1224 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 6 December 2015 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 715 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | 6 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1690 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 845 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |