Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940

  • Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 715 MHz
  • Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 24.00 GB/s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3158
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3158
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1000 MHz vs 715 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.00 GB/s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3366 vs 3158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3366 vs 3158

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

  • Around 55% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed 620 MHz vs 400 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3366
3158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3366
3158
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3366 3158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3366 3158
PassMark - G3D Mark 986
PassMark - G2D Mark 161
Geekbench - OpenCL 5753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1775
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1775
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 AMD Radeon R7 M260X

Essentials

Architecture Generation 11.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Ice Lake GT2 Opal
Launch price (MSRP) $969
Place in performance rating 1222 1224
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date 6 December 2015

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 715 MHz
Compute units 48 6
Core clock speed 400 MHz 620 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 211 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1690 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 845 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 384
Texture fill rate 24.00 GB/s 17.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Floating-point performance 549.1 gflops
Transistor count 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.3
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore