Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and ATI Mobility FireGL V3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.5x more boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 18x more pipelines: 72 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
• 512x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 128 MB
• 31.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 62
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 238

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 62
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 238

Compare specifications (specs)