Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
5.3x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 48 vs 40
8.5x better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 1191
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 399
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 2095
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 2095

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	48 vs 40
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1461 vs 1191
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475 vs 2095

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5081 vs 4466
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 958
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 958

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5081 vs 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3285 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3285 vs 958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

1191

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

399

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

2095

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4466

5081

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3285

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark	1461	1191
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475	2095
Geekbench - OpenCL	4466	5081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	958	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	958	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	5 September 2014	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	789	644
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	48	40
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	392 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Memory
Shared memory	1	1
Memory type		eDRAM
Technologies
Quick Sync