Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1019 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 465
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 1673
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 1673

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 3 May 2012
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1019 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 465
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304 vs 1673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304 vs 1673

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
4.2x more texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 55.2 GTexel / s
64x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 48
7.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 1461
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 vs 2475
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 vs 2475
3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16270 vs 4467
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1849 vs 958
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1849 vs 958

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	915 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate	234 billion / sec vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 1536 vs 48
Floating-point performance	2x 3,130 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5590 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6875 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6875 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL	16270 vs 4467
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1849 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1849 vs 958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

5590

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

465

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

6875

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

6875

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4467

16270

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

1849

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

1849

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

1673

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

1673

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
PassMark - G3D Mark	1461	5590
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	465
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475	6875
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475	6875
Geekbench - OpenCL	4467	16270
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	958	1849
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	958	1849
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304	1673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304	1673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		46.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		930.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		29.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		97.861
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Kepler
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GK104
Launch date	5 September 2014	3 May 2012
Place in performance rating	789	737
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999
Value for money (0-100)		7.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1019 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	915 MHz
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	2x 3,130 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	2x 1536
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s	234 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	300 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		3072
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		11.0" (27.9 cm)
SLI options		Quad
Supplementary power connectors		Two 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
Memory
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		384 GB / s
Memory bus width		512-bit (256-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed		6008 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA