Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
13.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 204 Watt
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 451

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 10 December 2010
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 204 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 451

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Around 91% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 300 MHz
9.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 48
Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2707 vs 1461
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3501 vs 2475
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3501 vs 2475
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9891 vs 4462
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 958
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 958
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2304
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	574 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	448 vs 48
Floating-point performance	1,027.7 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2707 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3501 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3501 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL	9891 vs 4462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3689 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3689 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3335 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3335 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

2707

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

451

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

3501

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

3501

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4462

9891

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3689

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3689

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3335

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3335

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	1461	2707
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	451
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475	3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475	3501
Geekbench - OpenCL	4462	9891
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	958	3689
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	958	3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304	3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304	3335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		24.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		793.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		34.891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		90.839

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Fermi
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GF100
Launch date	5 September 2014	10 December 2010
Place in performance rating	789	774
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,399
Price now		$332.21
Value for money (0-100)		12.86
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	574 MHz
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	448
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	204 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		248 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		6 GB
Memory bandwidth		143.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		384 Bit
Memory clock speed		2988 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync