Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 16.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 247 Watt
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 428

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

• Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 9.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 48
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 1472
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2825 vs 2475
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2825 vs 2475
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10493 vs 4471
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 958
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 958
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2304
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1472 3017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	565 428
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 2825
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4471 10493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 3346

Compare specifications (specs)