Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830A

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce 830A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

NVIDIA GeForce 830A

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
3x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
Around 50% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1471 vs 1188
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 407
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 1767
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 1767
Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4469 vs 4315

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 22 July 2014
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1471 vs 1188
PassMark - G2D Mark	566 vs 407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475 vs 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475 vs 1767
Geekbench - OpenCL	4469 vs 4315

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830A

3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2889 vs 958
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2889 vs 958
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3302 vs 2304
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3302 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	256 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2889 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2889 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3302 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3302 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830A

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1471

1188

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

566

407

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

1767

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

1767

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4469

4315

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

2889

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

2889

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3302

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3302

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce 830A
PassMark - G3D Mark	1471	1188
PassMark - G2D Mark	566	407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475	1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475	1767
Geekbench - OpenCL	4469	4315
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	958	2889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	958	2889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304	3302
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304	3302

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce 830A
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Maxwell
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GM108
Launch date	5 September 2014	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	797	798
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1082 MHz
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	588.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	256
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s	18.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Technologies
Quick Sync