Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830A

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce 830A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • 3x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1471 vs 1188
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 407
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 1767
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 1767
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4462 vs 4315
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 22 July 2014
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1471 vs 1188
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 vs 407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 vs 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 vs 1767
Geekbench - OpenCL 4462 vs 4315

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830A

  • 3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2889 vs 958
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2889 vs 958
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3302 vs 2304
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3302 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 256 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2889 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2889 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3302 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3302 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830A

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1471
1188
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
566
407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
1767
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4462
4315
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
2889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
2889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3302
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3302
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce 830A
PassMark - G3D Mark 1471 1188
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 1767
Geekbench - OpenCL 4462 4315
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 2889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 2889
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3302
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3302

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce 830A

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Maxwell
Code name Broadwell GT3e GM108
Launch date 5 September 2014 22 July 2014
Place in performance rating 796 797
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1082 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 588.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 256
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 18.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync