Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830A
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce 830A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1471 vs 1188
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 407
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2475 vs 1767
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2475 vs 1767
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4462 vs 4315
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 22 July 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1471 vs 1188 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 vs 407 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 vs 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 vs 1767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4462 vs 4315 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830A
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2889 vs 958
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2889 vs 958
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3302 vs 2304
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3302 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 256 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2889 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2889 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3302 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3302 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce 830A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1471 | 1188 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 407 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 1767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4462 | 4315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 2889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 2889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce 830A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GM108 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 796 | 797 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |