Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 23.2x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 48 vs 40
- 18.6x better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 47.52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 12x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1471 vs 123
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 408
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 782
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 25 February 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1471 vs 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 vs 408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 594 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 594 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | ATI Radeon HD 4250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1471 | 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4469 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | RV620 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 25 February 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 797 | 800 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 594 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | yes |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.34 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 792 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |