Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 13.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 462
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 31 May 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 462 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2999 vs 2536
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2999 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 1586
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 1586
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 2418
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 2418
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2673 vs 1626
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9276 vs 5885
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2999 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2999 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 2418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2673 vs 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9276 vs 5885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 3321 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 462 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 | 2673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 | 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.513 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.492 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF100 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 31 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 724 | 825 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $263.28 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Compute performance | 30x | |
CUDA cores | 352 | |
Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 352 | |
Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |