Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 13.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 200 Watt
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 462
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 31 May 2010
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 200 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 vs 462

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

  • Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2999 vs 2536
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2999 vs 2536
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 1586
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 1586
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 2418
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 2418
  • Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2673 vs 1626
  • Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9276 vs 5885
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1215 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2999 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2999 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3660 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3660 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3321 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3321 vs 2418
PassMark - G3D Mark 2673 vs 1626
Geekbench - OpenCL 9276 vs 5885

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
3660
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
3321
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
572
462
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1626
2673
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5885
9276
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2536 2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2536 2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1586 3660
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1586 3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2418 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2418 3321
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 462
PassMark - G3D Mark 1626 2673
Geekbench - OpenCL 5885 9276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 19.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 741.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.513
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 64.492

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Fermi
Code name Broadwell GT3e GF100
Launch date 5 September 2014 31 May 2010
Place in performance rating 724 825
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $279
Price now $263.28
Value for money (0-100) 12.73

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 800 MHz 1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,100 million
Compute performance 30x
CUDA cores 352
Floating-point performance 855.4 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Pipelines 352
Texture fill rate 26.7 billion / sec

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
SLI options 2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 102.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround