Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD FirePro M5100

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD FirePro M5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 1703.2x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 31 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2687 vs 2103
• Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12205 vs 6311
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 22.202
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1138.276 vs 537.558
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.596 vs 2.245
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.742 vs 40.642
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.829 vs 108.052
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 2926
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 2926

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5100

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2687 2103
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 800
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12205 6311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1138.276 537.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.596 2.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.742 40.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	193.829 108.052
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 2926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 2926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3358

Compare specifications (specs)