Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1011 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 80.88 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 versus 58.971
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 1514
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 1514
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 1 February 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1011 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 80.88 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 versus 58.971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 1514 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 931 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 versus 2683
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 versus 368
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19228 versus 12008
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 versus 1137.292
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 versus 4.585
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 versus 61.701
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 versus 193.595
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 versus 5609
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 versus 5609
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 931 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 versus 2683 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 versus 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19228 versus 12008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 versus 1137.292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 versus 4.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 versus 61.701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 versus 193.595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 versus 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 versus 5609 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2683 | 3799 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12008 | 19228 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | 58.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 | 1235.247 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.585 | 5.195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.701 | 75.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.595 | 252.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1514 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Polaris 22 |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 632 | 635 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 931 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 2,588 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 204.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 1024 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1400 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |