Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1011 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 80.88 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 58.971
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 1514
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 1514
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 1 February 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1011 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 80.88 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 58.971 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 1514 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 931 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3621 versus 2687
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 versus 354
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19593 versus 12203
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 versus 1138.276
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.134 versus 4.596
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 versus 61.742
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 versus 193.829
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 versus 5609
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 versus 5609
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 931 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3621 versus 2687 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 versus 354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19593 versus 12203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 versus 1138.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.134 versus 4.596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 versus 61.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 versus 193.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 versus 5609 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 | 3621 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 480 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 | 19593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 58.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | 1235.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | 5.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | 75.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | 252.311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 6318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 6318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1514 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Polaris 22 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 621 | 622 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1011 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,588 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 204.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 1024 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1400 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
