Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 875
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 273
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 3519
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 1225
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1363
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3259
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 1225
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1363
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3259 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3259 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 594 | 1126 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
