Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 48
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 versus 875
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 versus 273
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 3519
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 1225
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 1363
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3259
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 1225
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 1363
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3259
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 48 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 versus 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 versus 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 versus 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3259 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3259 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 5 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 1126 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
