Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel UHD Graphics
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel UHD Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 1833.3x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 28.80
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 1493
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 293
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 22.935
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 337.37
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 1.338
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 19.62
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 29.757
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 21 Aug 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 28.80 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 1493 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 22.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 337.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 1.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 19.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 vs 29.757 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 1493 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 293 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 22.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 337.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 1.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 19.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 29.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Comet Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 21 Aug 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 594 | 1167 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 28.80 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan |