Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus Intel UHD Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel UHD Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 28.80
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 versus 1493
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 versus 293
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 22.935
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 337.37
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 1.338
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 19.62
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 29.757
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 21 Aug 2019 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 28.80 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 versus 1493 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 versus 293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 22.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 337.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 1.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 19.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 versus 29.757 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1100 MHz
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 1493 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 293 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 22.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 337.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 1.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 19.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 29.757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 21 Aug 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 1167 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 28.80 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
