Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 1042
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 241
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 4592
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 27.062
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 273.504
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 1.777
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 19.939
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 31.881
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2227
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2227

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2666 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 241
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11991 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.615 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.569 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.688 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	192.566 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2227

Compare specifications (specs)