Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 versus 1042
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 versus 241
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 4592
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 27.062
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 273.504
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 1.777
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 19.939
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 31.881
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2227
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2227
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 versus 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 versus 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 versus 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2227 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1100 MHz
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 1380 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |