Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 1269.2x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 41.6 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
• 9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 135 Watt
• 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 550
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 66

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

• 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2666 550
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 66
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3342

Compare specifications (specs)