Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 3367.3x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 793
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 149
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 3866
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 9.392
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 157.479
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 0.864
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 16.101
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 44.77
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 1589
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3339
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 1589
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 April 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 vs 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK107 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 594 | 1301 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 980 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |