Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 5 mois plus tard
Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 980 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
3.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 versus 793
2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 versus 149
3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 3866
8.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 9.392
7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 157.479
5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 0.864
3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 16.101
4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 44.77
3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 1589
Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3235
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3339
3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 1589
Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3235
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3339

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	2 Sep 2020 versus 1 April 2013
Vitesse augmenté	1100 MHz versus 980 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	52.80 GTexel/s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
Processus de fabrication	10 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2666 versus 793
PassMark - G2D Mark	383 versus 149
Geekbench - OpenCL	11991 versus 3866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859 versus 9.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1137.615 versus 157.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.569 versus 0.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.688 versus 16.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	192.566 versus 44.77
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609 versus 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 versus 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 versus 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609 versus 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 versus 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 versus 3339

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 300 MHz

Vitesse du noyau	810 MHz versus 300 MHz

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2666

793

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

383

149

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11991

3866

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79.859

9.392

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1137.615

157.479

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.569

0.864

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

61.688

16.101

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

192.566

44.77

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

1589

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3235

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

1589

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3235

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3339

Nom	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2666	793
PassMark - G2D Mark	383	149
Geekbench - OpenCL	11991	3866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859	9.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1137.615	157.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.569	0.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.688	16.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	192.566	44.77
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609	1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609	1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		345

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 12.0	Kepler
Nom de code	Tiger Lake GT1	GK107
Date de sortie	2 Sep 2020	1 April 2013
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	594	1301
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1100 MHz	980 MHz
Unités de Compute	48
Vitesse du noyau	300 MHz	810 MHz
Processus de fabrication	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	844.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	384
Pixel fill rate	13.20 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	52.80 GTexel/s	15.68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Performance á point flottant		752.6 gflops
Compte de transistor		1,270 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)		Up to 3840x2160
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2		Up to 3840x2160
Protection du contenu HDCP
HDMI
Support du signale LVDS		Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Largeur	IGP
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.1	12 API
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale		2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		14.4 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire		64 / 128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire		1802 MHz
Genre de mémoire		DDR3
Mémoire partagé		0
Configuration standard de la mémoire		DDR3 / GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus