Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
790.2x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 75.758
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 843.503
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 24.676
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3687
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3336
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3687
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3336

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Sep 2020 vs 25 October 2016
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859 vs 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1137.615 vs 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.688 vs 24.676
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

4.6x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 2666
Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 383
Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 11991
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.569
Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 192.566
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5609
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5609

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6332 vs 2666
PassMark - G2D Mark	650 vs 383
Geekbench - OpenCL	20732 vs 11991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071 vs 4.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168 vs 192.566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496 vs 5609
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496 vs 5609

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2666

6332

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

383

650

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11991

20732

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79.859

75.758

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1137.615

843.503

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.569

5.071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

61.688

24.676

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

192.566

301.168

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3336

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

8496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3336

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	2666	6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	383	650
Geekbench - OpenCL	11991	20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859	75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1137.615	843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.569	5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.688	24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	192.566	301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		305

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.0	Pascal
Code name	Tiger Lake GT1	GP107
Launch date	2 Sep 2020	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	594	487
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$139
Price now		$159.99
Value for money (0-100)		46.07
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1392 MHz
Compute units	48
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	844.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	768
Pixel fill rate	13.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s	66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
CUDA cores		768
Floating-point performance		2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Transistor count		3,300 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP
Length		145 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		112 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		7 GB/s
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready