Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 380

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• 4.5x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 52.80 GTexel/s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 2666
• 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 11991
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 79.859
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 1137.615
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 4.569
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 61.688
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 192.566
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 5609
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3708
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3356
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 5609
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3708
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2666 7539
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 380
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11991 41907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 152.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.615 1843.045
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.569 10.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.688 115.607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	192.566 644.098
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 8062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 8062

Compare specifications (specs)