Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 1557.5x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 33.9 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 1749
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 368
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 4493
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 12.582
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 364.463
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 1.254
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 18.386
- 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 23.499
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 2663
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3332
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 2663
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 27 November 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 33.9 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 vs 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 27 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 594 | 1003 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
